A general note: Please write out proofs as carefully as you can. At any point where you use any result, either from class or from the text, state the result carefully. I have given below a sample problem that indicates the approximate level of detail you should give in a proof.

Example: Let V be a vector space over a field F. Let U, W be subspaces of V, neither of which contain the other. Then the union of U and U' is not a subspace.

Proof: Suppose, by way of contradiction, that the union of U and U' is a subspace.
By assumption, there exists a vector u in U which is not in U', and a vector u' in U' which is not in U. Let v = u + u'. Then v does not belong to U, because, if it did, u' = v-u would belong to U, contradicting our assumption. Symmetric reasoning shows that v does not belong to U'.
We have exhibited two elements (u and u') of the union of U and U', whose sum (namely, v) does not belong to the union. Therefore, it is not a subspace.


Problem set 1, due Friday October 3 at 5pm: Solutions.

Problem set 2, due Friday October 10 at 5pm: Solutions; another set of solutions by the CA is here.
Problem set 3, due Friday, October 17. Because of midterms, you can hand in any FOUR of the Axler problems and ONE of the written problems below, although I recommend that you try them all if you have the time.
Problem set 4, due Friday, October 24. With apologies for the late posting ! - AV . (These questions are somewhat more abstract than what we have encountered so far. In all cases, if you don't know where to start, first try to figure out an example; partial credit will be given for any correctly worked out special case.)
  1. Describe (with proof) how the adjoint of a composition of two linear maps relates to the adjoints of each linear map separately.
  2. Suppose X, Y are two vector spaces. Let Z be the direct sum of X and Y. Prove that Z* is isomorphic to the direct sum of X* and Y*. (Note: do not assume the vector spaces are finite dimensional.)
  3. In the following questions, V, W are finite dimensional vector spaces over the field F, T: V-->W is a linear map and T^: W*-->V* be the adjoint. Prove the following.
  4. Suppose that V is a finite-dimensional vector space with basis e1, ... en. Let e1*, ..., en* be the dual basis for V*.

    Suppose that T: V-->V* has a matrix a_{ij} (with respect to these bases) that is symmetric, i.e., a_{ij} = a_{ji}. Prove that this is "independent of basis", i.e., given any other basis f1, ..., fn, with dual basis f1*, ..., fn*, the matrix of T with respect to (f1, ..., fn) and (f1*, ..., fn*) is also symmetric.

    (Hint: the elegant way to solve ths problem is to find a way to phrase "symmetric" without reference to a basis.)

Solutions.
Problem set 5, due Friday October 31, 5pm. The determinant of an nxn matrix M with entries in a field F is the determinant of the linear transformation F^n ---> F^n given by matrix multiplication with M.
  1. Suppose that M is a square upper triangular matrix. (This means that all entries of M strictly below the diagonal are zero.) Prove, from the definition of determinants as presented in class, that the determinant of M is the product of the diagonal entries.
  2. Let D be a nonzero alternating 3-form on R^3. Describe in geometric terms when, for v1, v2, v3 in R^3, the sign of D(v1, v2, v3) is positive.
  3. Suppose that D is a nonzero alternating n-form on an n-dimensional vector space V. Suppose that e1, ..., en is a basis for V.
  4. (This is Katznelson Corollary 4.4.4; try to prove it yourself before looking it up.) Suppose that V is the interior direct sum of subspaces W1, W2. Suppose T: V --> V "preserves" W1 and W2. This means that whenever w in W1, then also T(w) in W1, and similarly for W2. Let T1 = T restricted to W1, and let T2 = T restricted to W2. Prove that det(T) = det(T1) det(T2).
  5. Do either Katznelson IV. 5.5. (Hint: the prior problem may be helpful) or Katznelson IV. 5. 12. (The problem about Vandermonde matrices.)
  6. Suppose that M is a 2x2 matrix with entries a,b,c,d. Suppose that, for every scalar x in F, the determinant of xM + Id (where Id is the 2x2 identity matrix) equals 1. Prove that M^2 = 0.
  7. Extra credit: generalize the previous question to nxn matrices (partial credit for 3x3).
  8. Extra credit: Let A: V --> V be a linear transformation on a finite dimensional space V. Let A^: V* ---> V* be the adjoint. Prove det(A) = det(A^). Solutions.

Problem set 6, due Friday November 7 5pm.

Problem set 7, due Friday November 14, 5pm. (Apologies for late posting!)
  • Axler Chapter 6, problems 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 13, 21, either 22 or 23.
  • Extra credit: A variant of the problem from class: In R^n, how many vectors can you find which are mutually obtuse? In other words, what is the largest size of a list v1, ..., vk so that every inner product of distinct vectors is negative? Comment: This type of question is related to coding theory; can you see why?
    solutions.
    Problem set 8, due Friday November 21, 5pm.
  • Axler, Chapter 6, problems 24, 27, 29, 30.
  • Axler, Chapter 7, problems 1,2, 3(b), 11, 14.
    Extra credit: Suppose that V and W are finite-dimensional inner product spaces. Let L be the space of linear maps from V to W. Describe a natural inner product on L. (Natural means that it does not depend on any choices. Thus, if you choose a basis in order to define your inner product, you should later prove that it was independent of the choice of basis.) Comment: This is a useful thing to know, because we would like to be able to make sense of ``one linear transformation approximating another.''
    solutions.
    Problem set 9. NOT FOR ASSESSMENT (however, if you wish to hand in any of it, it can be graded to see if it is correct!)

    Solutions.
    Akshay Venkatesh
    Department of Mathematics Rm. 383-E
    Stanford University
    Stanford, CA
    email: akshay at stanford math