MAT 201 Spring 1998 Statistics


Staff
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING
Unacc. <--> Excel.
1
2
3
4
5
#Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking 13% 47% 33% 7% 15
3.3
2. Clear presentation of subject matter 7% 21% 36% 36% 14
4.0
3. Overall quality of lectures 7% 20% 53% 20% 15
3.9
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking 50% 50% 2
4.0
5. Ability to raise challenging questions 50% 50% 2
4.5
6. Ability to help clarify course material 33% 67% 3
3.7
7. Ability to encourage participation 100% 3
4.0
8. Instructor's responsiveness 67% 33% 3
4.3
9. Overall quality of seminars 50% 50% 2
4.5
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions 3% 23% 42% 32% 71
4.0
11. Ability to help clarify course material 4% 14% 27% 55% 73
4.3
12. Ability to encourage participation 5% 29% 40% 26% 73
3.9
13. Instructor's responsiveness 11% 27% 62% 73
4.5
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 3% 11% 33% 53% 73
4.4
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking 19% 39% 39% 3% 59
3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter 3% 22% 47% 20% 8% 60
3.1
24. Overall quality of readings 22% 40% 37% 2% 60
3.2
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work 3% 30% 46% 21% 71
3.9
26. Comments in response to written work 13% 29% 45% 13% 69
3.6
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams 5% 19% 58% 18% 73
3.9
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 1% 12% 56% 31% 77
4.2
29. Contribution to critical evaluation 5% 20% 63% 12% 75
3.8
30. Contribution to interest in subject 3% 14% 32% 39% 12% 77
3.4
31. Overall quality of the course 1% 25% 61% 13% 76
3.9
Course Enrollment = 99 Evaluations Returned = 77 Response = 78%

S. Cuccagna
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING
Unacc. <--> Excel.
1
2
3
4
5
#Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking 100% 1
3.0
2. Clear presentation of subject matter 100% 1
2.0
3. Overall quality of lectures 100% 1
2.0
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions
11. Ability to help clarify course material 100% 1
2.0
12. Ability to encourage participation 100% 1
2.0
13. Instructor's responsiveness 100% 1
3.0
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 100% 1
2.0
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking 100% 1
4.0
23. Clear presentation of subject matter 100% 1
4.0
24. Overall quality of readings 100% 1
4.0
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work 100% 1
4.0
26. Comments in response to written work 100% 1
4.0
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams 100% 1
4.0
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 100% 1
4.0
29. Contribution to critical evaluation 100% 1
4.0
30. Contribution to interest in subject 100% 1
3.0
31. Overall quality of the course 100% 1
4.0
Evaluations Returned = 1

No Instructor Named
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING
Unacc. <--> Excel.
1
2
3
4
5
#Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking
2. Clear presentation of subject matter
3. Overall quality of lectures
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions 100% 1
5.0
11. Ability to help clarify course material 100% 1
5.0
12. Ability to encourage participation 100% 1
5.0
13. Instructor's responsiveness 100% 1
5.0
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 100% 1
5.0
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking 100% 1
3.0
23. Clear presentation of subject matter 100% 1
3.0
24. Overall quality of readings 100% 1
3.0
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work 100% 1
4.0
26. Comments in response to written work 100% 1
4.0
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams 100% 1
3.0
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 100% 1
5.0
29. Contribution to critical evaluation 100% 1
4.0
30. Contribution to interest in subject 100% 1
4.0
31. Overall quality of the course 100% 1
5.0
Evaluations Returned = 1

F.J.Swenton
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING
Unacc. <--> Excel.
1
2
3
4
5
#Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking 100% 1
4.0
2. Clear presentation of subject matter 100% 1
4.0
3. Overall quality of lectures 100% 1
4.0
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions 21% 47% 32% 19
4.1
11. Ability to help clarify course material 5% 30% 65% 20
4.6
12. Ability to encourage participation 40% 30% 30% 20
3.9
13. Instructor's responsiveness 10% 90% 20
4.9
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 30% 70% 20
4.7
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking 7% 60% 33% 15
3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter 13% 63% 19% 6% 16
3.2
24. Overall quality of readings 6% 69% 25% 16
3.2
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work 29% 41% 29% 17
4.0
26. Comments in response to written work 6% 24% 59% 12% 17
3.8
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams 12% 76% 12% 17
3.9
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 5% 10% 50% 35% 20
4.1
29. Contribution to critical evaluation 25% 60% 15% 20
3.9
30. Contribution to interest in subject 5% 15% 20% 50% 10% 20
3.4
31. Overall quality of the course 32% 58% 11% 19
3.8
Evaluations Returned = 20

Z. Szabo
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING
Unacc. <--> Excel.
1
2
3
4
5
#Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking 33% 50% 17% 6
2.8
2. Clear presentation of subject matter 50% 33% 17% 6
3.7
3. Overall quality of lectures 50% 50% 6
3.5
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions 8% 46% 38% 8% 13
3.5
11. Ability to help clarify course material 8% 38% 38% 15% 13
3.6
12. Ability to encourage participation 15% 38% 46% 13
3.3
13. Instructor's responsiveness 46% 46% 8% 13
3.6
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 8% 23% 62% 8% 13
3.7
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking 20% 80% 5
2.8
23. Clear presentation of subject matter 20% 40% 40% 5
2.2
24. Overall quality of readings 60% 40% 5
2.4
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work 8% 62% 23% 8% 13
3.3
26. Comments in response to written work 17% 50% 33% 12
3.2
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams 46% 46% 8% 13
3.6
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 29% 57% 14% 14
3.9
29. Contribution to critical evaluation 15% 46% 38% 13
3.2
30. Contribution to interest in subject 36% 36% 21% 7% 14
3.0
31. Overall quality of the course 7% 57% 29% 7% 14
3.4
Evaluations Returned = 14

R.D.Vakil
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING
Unacc. <--> Excel.
1
2
3
4
5
#Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking 43% 43% 14% 7
3.7
2. Clear presentation of subject matter 33% 67% 6
4.7
3. Overall quality of lectures 57% 43% 7
4.4
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking 50% 50% 2
4.0
5. Ability to raise challenging questions 50% 50% 2
4.5
6. Ability to help clarify course material 33% 67% 3
3.7
7. Ability to encourage participation 100% 3
4.0
8. Instructor's responsiveness 67% 33% 3
4.3
9. Overall quality of seminars 50% 50% 2
4.5
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions 13% 43% 43% 30
4.3
11. Ability to help clarify course material 10% 17% 73% 30
4.6
12. Ability to encourage participation 17% 43% 40% 30
4.2
13. Instructor's responsiveness 3% 27% 70% 30
4.7
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 7% 20% 73% 30
4.7
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking 27% 20% 47% 7% 30
3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter 30% 43% 23% 3% 30
3.0
24. Overall quality of readings 27% 30% 43% 30
3.2
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work 3% 16% 55% 26% 31
4.0
26. Comments in response to written work 16% 23% 42% 19% 31
3.6
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams 6% 15% 52% 27% 33
4.0
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 6% 58% 36% 33
4.3
29. Contribution to critical evaluation 3% 13% 69% 16% 32
4.0
30. Contribution to interest in subject 3% 6% 36% 36% 18% 33
3.6
31. Overall quality of the course 9% 73% 18% 33
4.1
Evaluations Returned = 33

J. Yu
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING
Unacc. <--> Excel.
1
2
3
4
5
#Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking
2. Clear presentation of subject matter
3. Overall quality of lectures
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions 13% 25% 38% 25% 8
3.8
11. Ability to help clarify course material 13% 13% 50% 25% 8
3.9
12. Ability to encourage participation 13% 38% 50% 8
3.4
13. Instructor's responsiveness 50% 50% 8
4.5
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes 38% 50% 13% 8
3.8
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking 14% 43% 43% 7
3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter 14% 29% 14% 43% 7
3.7
24. Overall quality of readings 14% 14% 57% 14% 7
3.7
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work 38% 50% 13% 8
3.8
26. Comments in response to written work 14% 43% 29% 14% 7
3.4
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams 25% 63% 13% 8
3.9
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject 13% 63% 25% 8
4.1
29. Contribution to critical evaluation 13% 75% 13% 8
3.9
30. Contribution to interest in subject 13% 38% 50% 8
3.4
31. Overall quality of the course 25% 75% 8
3.8
Evaluations Returned = 8