MAT 201 Spring 1998 Statistics

Staff
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	Unacc. <--> Excel.
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	1	2	3	4	5	#	Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking		13%	47%	33%	7%	15	3.3
2. Clear presentation of subject matter		7%	21%	36%	36%	14	4.0
3. Overall quality of lectures		7%	20%	53%	20%	15	3.9
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking			50%		50%	2	4.0
5. Ability to raise challenging questions				50%	50%	2	4.5
6. Ability to help clarify course material			33%	67%		3	3.7
7. Ability to encourage participation				100%		3	4.0
8. Instructor's responsiveness				67%	33%	3	4.3
9. Overall quality of seminars				50%	50%	2	4.5
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions		3%	23%	42%	32%	71	4.0
11. Ability to help clarify course material		4%	14%	27%	55%	73	4.3
12. Ability to encourage participation		5%	29%	40%	26%	73	3.9
13. Instructor's responsiveness			11%	27%	62%	73	4.5
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes		3%	11%	33%	53%	73	4.4
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking		19%	39%	39%	3%	59	3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter	3%	22%	47%	20%	8%	60	3.1
24. Overall quality of readings		22%	40%	37%	2%	60	3.2
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work		3%	30%	46%	21%	71	3.9
26. Comments in response to written work		13%	29%	45%	13%	69	3.6
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams		5%	19%	58%	18%	73	3.9
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject		1%	12%	56%	31%	77	4.2
29. Contribution to critical evaluation		5%	20%	63%	12%	75	3.8
30. Contribution to interest in subject	3%	14%	32%	39%	12%	77	3.4
31. Overall quality of the course		1%	25%	61%	13%	76	3.9
Course Enrollment = 99 Evaluations Returned = 77 Response = 78%

S. Cuccagna
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	Unacc. <--> Excel.
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	1	2	3	4	5	#	Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking			100%			1	3.0
2. Clear presentation of subject matter		100%				1	2.0
3. Overall quality of lectures		100%				1	2.0
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions
11. Ability to help clarify course material		100%				1	2.0
12. Ability to encourage participation		100%				1	2.0
13. Instructor's responsiveness			100%			1	3.0
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes		100%				1	2.0
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking				100%		1	4.0
23. Clear presentation of subject matter				100%		1	4.0
24. Overall quality of readings				100%		1	4.0
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work				100%		1	4.0
26. Comments in response to written work				100%		1	4.0
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams				100%		1	4.0
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject				100%		1	4.0
29. Contribution to critical evaluation				100%		1	4.0
30. Contribution to interest in subject			100%			1	3.0
31. Overall quality of the course				100%		1	4.0
Evaluations Returned = 1

No Instructor Named
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	Unacc. <--> Excel.
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	1	2	3	4	5	#	Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking
2. Clear presentation of subject matter
3. Overall quality of lectures
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions					100%	1	5.0
11. Ability to help clarify course material					100%	1	5.0
12. Ability to encourage participation					100%	1	5.0
13. Instructor's responsiveness					100%	1	5.0
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes					100%	1	5.0
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking			100%			1	3.0
23. Clear presentation of subject matter			100%			1	3.0
24. Overall quality of readings			100%			1	3.0
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work				100%		1	4.0
26. Comments in response to written work				100%		1	4.0
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams			100%			1	3.0
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject					100%	1	5.0
29. Contribution to critical evaluation				100%		1	4.0
30. Contribution to interest in subject				100%		1	4.0
31. Overall quality of the course					100%	1	5.0
Evaluations Returned = 1

F.J.Swenton
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	Unacc. <--> Excel.
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	1	2	3	4	5	#	Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking				100%		1	4.0
2. Clear presentation of subject matter				100%		1	4.0
3. Overall quality of lectures				100%		1	4.0
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions			21%	47%	32%	19	4.1
11. Ability to help clarify course material			5%	30%	65%	20	4.6
12. Ability to encourage participation			40%	30%	30%	20	3.9
13. Instructor's responsiveness				10%	90%	20	4.9
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes				30%	70%	20	4.7
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking		7%	60%	33%		15	3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter		13%	63%	19%	6%	16	3.2
24. Overall quality of readings		6%	69%	25%		16	3.2
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work			29%	41%	29%	17	4.0
26. Comments in response to written work		6%	24%	59%	12%	17	3.8
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams		12%		76%	12%	17	3.9
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject		5%	10%	50%	35%	20	4.1
29. Contribution to critical evaluation			25%	60%	15%	20	3.9
30. Contribution to interest in subject	5%	15%	20%	50%	10%	20	3.4
31. Overall quality of the course			32%	58%	11%	19	3.8
Evaluations Returned = 20

Z. Szabo
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	Unacc. <--> Excel.
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	1	2	3	4	5	#	Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking		33%	50%	17%		6	2.8
2. Clear presentation of subject matter			50%	33%	17%	6	3.7
3. Overall quality of lectures			50%	50%		6	3.5
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions		8%	46%	38%	8%	13	3.5
11. Ability to help clarify course material		8%	38%	38%	15%	13	3.6
12. Ability to encourage participation		15%	38%	46%		13	3.3
13. Instructor's responsiveness			46%	46%	8%	13	3.6
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes		8%	23%	62%	8%	13	3.7
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking		20%	80%			5	2.8
23. Clear presentation of subject matter	20%	40%	40%			5	2.2
24. Overall quality of readings		60%	40%			5	2.4
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work		8%	62%	23%	8%	13	3.3
26. Comments in response to written work		17%	50%	33%		12	3.2
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams			46%	46%	8%	13	3.6
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject			29%	57%	14%	14	3.9
29. Contribution to critical evaluation		15%	46%	38%		13	3.2
30. Contribution to interest in subject		36%	36%	21%	7%	14	3.0
31. Overall quality of the course		7%	57%	29%	7%	14	3.4
Evaluations Returned = 14

R.D.Vakil
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	Unacc. <--> Excel.
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	1	2	3	4	5	#	Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking			43%	43%	14%	7	3.7
2. Clear presentation of subject matter				33%	67%	6	4.7
3. Overall quality of lectures				57%	43%	7	4.4
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking			50%		50%	2	4.0
5. Ability to raise challenging questions				50%	50%	2	4.5
6. Ability to help clarify course material			33%	67%		3	3.7
7. Ability to encourage participation				100%		3	4.0
8. Instructor's responsiveness				67%	33%	3	4.3
9. Overall quality of seminars				50%	50%	2	4.5
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions			13%	43%	43%	30	4.3
11. Ability to help clarify course material			10%	17%	73%	30	4.6
12. Ability to encourage participation			17%	43%	40%	30	4.2
13. Instructor's responsiveness			3%	27%	70%	30	4.7
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes			7%	20%	73%	30	4.7
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking		27%	20%	47%	7%	30	3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter		30%	43%	23%	3%	30	3.0
24. Overall quality of readings		27%	30%	43%		30	3.2
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work		3%	16%	55%	26%	31	4.0
26. Comments in response to written work		16%	23%	42%	19%	31	3.6
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams		6%	15%	52%	27%	33	4.0
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject			6%	58%	36%	33	4.3
29. Contribution to critical evaluation		3%	13%	69%	16%	32	4.0
30. Contribution to interest in subject	3%	6%	36%	36%	18%	33	3.6
31. Overall quality of the course			9%	73%	18%	33	4.1
Evaluations Returned = 33

J. Yu
(Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class)
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	Unacc. <--> Excel.
PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING	1	2	3	4	5	#	Avg.
LECTURES:
1. Stimulation of independent thinking
2. Clear presentation of subject matter
3. Overall quality of lectures
SEMINARS:
4. Stimulation of independent thinking
5. Ability to raise challenging questions
6. Ability to help clarify course material
7. Ability to encourage participation
8. Instructor's responsiveness
9. Overall quality of seminars
PRECEPTS, CLASSES:
10. Ability to raise challenging questions		13%	25%	38%	25%	8	3.8
11. Ability to help clarify course material		13%	13%	50%	25%	8	3.9
12. Ability to encourage participation		13%	38%	50%		8	3.4
13. Instructor's responsiveness				50%	50%	8	4.5
14. Overall quality of precepts,classes			38%	50%	13%	8	3.8
LANGUAGE COURSES:
15. Helpfulness in reading the language
16. Helpfulness in speaking the language
17. Helpfulness in writing the language
18. Overall help in using the language
LABORATORIES:
19. Usefulness to lectures and readings
20. Instructor's organization and guidance
21. Overall quality of laboratories
READINGS:
22. Stimulation of independent thinking		14%	43%	43%		7	3.3
23. Clear presentation of subject matter	14%		29%	14%	43%	7	3.7
24. Overall quality of readings		14%	14%	57%	14%	7	3.7
PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS:
25. Guidance in preparation of written work			38%	50%	13%	8	3.8
26. Comments in response to written work		14%	43%	29%	14%	7	3.4
27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams			25%	63%	13%	8	3.9
GENERAL:
28. Contribution to knowledge of subject			13%	63%	25%	8	4.1
29. Contribution to critical evaluation		13%		75%	13%	8	3.9
30. Contribution to interest in subject		13%	38%	50%		8	3.4
31. Overall quality of the course			25%	75%		8	3.8
Evaluations Returned = 8