W. Hsiang
| PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING | # | Avg.
| LECTURES: | 1. Stimulation of independent thinking | 2% | 8% | 21% | 43% | 26% | 61 | 2. Clear presentation of subject matter | 7% | 9% | 16% | 26% | 43% | 58 | 3. Overall quality of lectures | 5% | 5% | 22% | 29% | 38% | 58 | SEMINARS: | 4. Stimulation of independent thinking | | 14% | 43% | | 43% | 7 | 5. Ability to raise challenging questions | | 38% | 13% | 25% | 25% | 8 | 6. Ability to help clarify course material | | 22% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 9 | 7. Ability to encourage participation | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 9 | 8. Instructor's responsiveness | 13% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 8 | 9. Overall quality of seminars | 13% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 25% | 8 | PRECEPTS, CLASSES: | 10. Ability to raise challenging questions | 1% | 4% | 22% | 39% | 34% | 100 | 11. Ability to help clarify course material | 2% | 13% | 12% | 28% | 45% | 102 | 12. Ability to encourage participation | 5% | 11% | 28% | 22% | 35% | 101 | 13. Instructor's responsiveness | 3% | 9% | 13% | 19% | 57% | 102 | 14. Overall quality of precepts,classes | 1% | 11% | 13% | 30% | 45% | 102 | LANGUAGE COURSES: | 15. Helpfulness in reading the language | 16. Helpfulness in speaking the language | 17. Helpfulness in writing the language | 18. Overall help in using the language | LABORATORIES: | 19. Usefulness to lectures and readings | 20. Instructor's organization and guidance | 21. Overall quality of laboratories | READINGS: | 22. Stimulation of independent thinking | 3% | 9% | 50% | 35% | 3% | 34 | 23. Clear presentation of subject matter | 3% | 17% | 34% | 34% | 11% | 35 | 24. Overall quality of readings | 3% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 35 | PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS: | 25. Guidance in preparation of written work | 3% | 11% | 25% | 41% | 20% | 107 | 26. Comments in response to written work | 5% | 17% | 26% | 35% | 17% | 103 | 27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams | 1% | 6% | 22% | 55% | 17% | 108 | GENERAL: | 28. Contribution to knowledge of subject | 1% | 8% | 12% | 40% | 39% | 108 | 29. Contribution to critical evaluation | 1% | 8% | 16% | 47% | 28% | 107 | 30. Contribution to interest in subject | 2% | 17% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 108 | 31. Overall quality of the course | 2% | 7% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 107 | Course Enrollment = 145 Evaluations Returned = 113 Response = 78%
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
W. Hsiang
| (Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class) | PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING | # | Avg.
| LECTURES: | 1. Stimulation of independent thinking | 8% | 8% | 42% | 42% | | 12 | 2. Clear presentation of subject matter | 27% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 11 | 3. Overall quality of lectures | 27% | 9% | 55% | 9% | | 11 | SEMINARS: | 4. Stimulation of independent thinking | | | 67% | | 33% | 3 | 5. Ability to raise challenging questions | | 33% | 33% | 33% | | 3 | 6. Ability to help clarify course material | | 25% | 50% | 25% | | 4 | 7. Ability to encourage participation | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | | 4 | 8. Instructor's responsiveness | 33% | | 67% | | | 3 | 9. Overall quality of seminars | 33% | | 33% | 33% | | 3 | PRECEPTS, CLASSES: | 10. Ability to raise challenging questions | 9% | 9% | 36% | 45% | | 11 | 11. Ability to help clarify course material | 18% | 64% | 9% | 9% | | 11 | 12. Ability to encourage participation | 9% | 45% | 27% | 18% | | 11 | 13. Instructor's responsiveness | 27% | 27% | 27% | 18% | | 11 | 14. Overall quality of precepts,classes | 9% | 45% | 27% | 18% | | 11 | LANGUAGE COURSES: | 15. Helpfulness in reading the language | 16. Helpfulness in speaking the language | 17. Helpfulness in writing the language | 18. Overall help in using the language | LABORATORIES: | 19. Usefulness to lectures and readings | 20. Instructor's organization and guidance | 21. Overall quality of laboratories | READINGS: | 22. Stimulation of independent thinking | 20% | | 20% | 60% | | 5 | 23. Clear presentation of subject matter | 20% | | 20% | 40% | 20% | 5 | 24. Overall quality of readings | 20% | 20% | | 40% | 20% | 5 | PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS: | 25. Guidance in preparation of written work | 18% | 9% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 11 | 26. Comments in response to written work | 10% | 20% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10 | 27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams | 8% | 8% | 17% | 58% | 8% | 12 | GENERAL: | 28. Contribution to knowledge of subject | 8% | 17% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 12 | 29. Contribution to critical evaluation | 8% | 17% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 12 | 30. Contribution to interest in subject | 8% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 12 | 31. Overall quality of the course | 17% | 17% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 12 | Evaluations Returned = 13
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Z. Szabo
| (Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class) | PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING | # | Avg.
| LECTURES: | 1. Stimulation of independent thinking | | 13% | 33% | 42% | 13% | 24 | 2. Clear presentation of subject matter | 4% | 4% | 30% | 35% | 26% | 23 | 3. Overall quality of lectures | | 9% | 30% | 48% | 13% | 23 | SEMINARS: | 4. Stimulation of independent thinking | | 50% | | | 50% | 2 | 5. Ability to raise challenging questions | | 67% | | | 33% | 3 | 6. Ability to help clarify course material | | 33% | 33% | | 33% | 3 | 7. Ability to encourage participation | 33% | 33% | | | 33% | 3 | 8. Instructor's responsiveness | | 67% | | | 33% | 3 | 9. Overall quality of seminars | | 67% | | | 33% | 3 | PRECEPTS, CLASSES: | 10. Ability to raise challenging questions | | 7% | 38% | 40% | 14% | 42 | 11. Ability to help clarify course material | | 14% | 21% | 42% | 23% | 43 | 12. Ability to encourage participation | 10% | 12% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 42 | 13. Instructor's responsiveness | | 14% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 43 | 14. Overall quality of precepts,classes | | 14% | 21% | 42% | 23% | 43 | LANGUAGE COURSES: | 15. Helpfulness in reading the language | 16. Helpfulness in speaking the language | 17. Helpfulness in writing the language | 18. Overall help in using the language | LABORATORIES: | 19. Usefulness to lectures and readings | 20. Instructor's organization and guidance | 21. Overall quality of laboratories | READINGS: | 22. Stimulation of independent thinking | | 14% | 50% | 36% | | 14 | 23. Clear presentation of subject matter | | 27% | 33% | 33% | 7% | 15 | 24. Overall quality of readings | | 20% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 15 | PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS: | 25. Guidance in preparation of written work | 2% | 22% | 31% | 33% | 11% | 45 | 26. Comments in response to written work | 7% | 26% | 33% | 26% | 7% | 42 | 27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams | | 7% | 33% | 47% | 13% | 45 | GENERAL: | 28. Contribution to knowledge of subject | | 11% | 11% | 55% | 23% | 47 | 29. Contribution to critical evaluation | | 11% | 24% | 52% | 13% | 46 | 30. Contribution to interest in subject | 2% | 23% | 40% | 32% | 2% | 47 | 31. Overall quality of the course | | 11% | 28% | 57% | 4% | 47 | Evaluations Returned = 48
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R.D.Vakil
| (Sub-Report for Students in Precept,Class) | PERCENTAGES, ITEM COUNT, AND AVERAGE RATING | # | Avg.
| LECTURES: | 1. Stimulation of independent thinking | | 4% | | 44% | 52% | 25 | 2. Clear presentation of subject matter | | | | 25% | 75% | 24 | 3. Overall quality of lectures | | | | 21% | 79% | 24 | SEMINARS: | 4. Stimulation of independent thinking | | | 50% | | 50% | 2 | 5. Ability to raise challenging questions | | | | 50% | 50% | 2 | 6. Ability to help clarify course material | | | | 50% | 50% | 2 | 7. Ability to encourage participation | | | 50% | 50% | | 2 | 8. Instructor's responsiveness | | | | 50% | 50% | 2 | 9. Overall quality of seminars | | | | 50% | 50% | 2 | PRECEPTS, CLASSES: | 10. Ability to raise challenging questions | | | 4% | 36% | 60% | 47 | 11. Ability to help clarify course material | | | 4% | 21% | 75% | 48 | 12. Ability to encourage participation | | 2% | 8% | 23% | 67% | 48 | 13. Instructor's responsiveness | | | 4% | 2% | 94% | 48 | 14. Overall quality of precepts,classes | | | 2% | 23% | 75% | 48 | LANGUAGE COURSES: | 15. Helpfulness in reading the language | 16. Helpfulness in speaking the language | 17. Helpfulness in writing the language | 18. Overall help in using the language | LABORATORIES: | 19. Usefulness to lectures and readings | 20. Instructor's organization and guidance | 21. Overall quality of laboratories | READINGS: | 22. Stimulation of independent thinking | | 7% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 15 | 23. Clear presentation of subject matter | | 13% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 15 | 24. Overall quality of readings | | 7% | 40% | 40% | 13% | 15 | PAPERS, REPORTS, PROBLEM SETS, EXAMS: | 25. Guidance in preparation of written work | | 2% | 16% | 53% | 29% | 51 | 26. Comments in response to written work | 2% | 8% | 18% | 45% | 27% | 51 | 27. Overall value of papers,reports,exams | | 4% | 14% | 61% | 22% | 51 | GENERAL: | 28. Contribution to knowledge of subject | | 4% | 6% | 31% | 59% | 49 | 29. Contribution to critical evaluation | | 4% | 4% | 47% | 45% | 49 | 30. Contribution to interest in subject | | 6% | 16% | 41% | 37% | 49 | 31. Overall quality of the course | | 2% | 2% | 33% | 63% | 48 | Evaluations Returned = 52
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||